← Search

Amanda Moberly

Fayetteville, GA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 10W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Amanda Moberly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-03-11 · YMCA - Yearta/Hicks · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janelle Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-21 · SCTA/Cindy Hicks · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Feygin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2024-11-01 · Woodcreek - Bradley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Moberly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-10-09 · Woodcreek - Hicks/Terranova · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janelle Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-10-02 · Woodcreek - Hicks/Terranova · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Connally
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2024-09-27 · Woodcreek - Bradley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Moberly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-11 · Woodcreek - Hicks/Terranova · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-07 · Woodcreek-Terranova/Hicks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-02-06 · Woodcreek-Terranova/Hicks · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyson Cannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2024-01-28 · Woodcreek-Terranova/Hicks · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyson Cannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 7-6
L
2024-01-10 · Woodcreek-Terranova/Hicks · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janelle Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-12-20 · Woodcreek-Terranova/Hicks · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.9% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #4 Doubles, 29% of the time
#4 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
4 matches
#1 Singles
19%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova