← Search

Ina Christensen

Brooks, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 54W–32L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Ina Christensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-08-06 · PTCTC-Stoots/Simpson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Summergrove-Galusha/Jones · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · Summergrove-Galusha/Jones · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · Summergrove-Galusha/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · PTCTC-Stoots/Simpson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Stoots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-08 · Summergrove-Galusha/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · Summergrove-Galusha/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-26 · Summergrove-Galusha/Jones · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-10 · Summergrove-Galusha/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · PTCTC-Stoots/Simpson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · Summergrove-Galusha/Jones · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-29 · YMCA - Yearta/Hicks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janelle Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
62.5%
45W–27L · 53.3% of games
4.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.1% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
13%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal