← Search

Eric VanderPloeg

Rolling Hills Estates, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 187W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric VanderPloeg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history283 matches
W
2026-09-11 · BC-Kramer/DanielleRaymond · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carly Capper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-28 · BC-Kramer/DanielleRaymond · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Tangeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Goff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carly Capper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Michelle Tangeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carly Capper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Christopher Corman / Mark Anderson
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Michelle Tangeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Goff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · BC-Kramer/BrianKebschull4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with J Stephen Pollock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
70%
14W–6L · 55.1% of games
4.0
60.8%
73W–47L · 55% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 40.6% of games
8.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.6% of games
0.0mixed
81.2%
26W–6L · 61.8% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
78.8%
26W–7L · 64% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
187 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
33 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer