← Search

Alexander Tang

Minnetonka, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 80W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Alexander Tang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Tang / Synthetic Guts & Glory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Hawkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Tang / Synthetic Guts & Glory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cody Malik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Tang / Synthetic Guts & Glory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Hawkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · Chu Tang Clan S26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angel Nasrabadi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-19 · Tang / S26-7 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mallory Herbst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · Peterson/ Leveris · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mickey Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-02 · Peterson/ Leveris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Travis Fondow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · Peterson/ Leveris · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harrison Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · Chu Tang Clan S26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angel Nasrabadi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Peterson/ Leveris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harrison Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-08 · Tang / S26-7 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mallory Herbst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · Peterson/ Leveris · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
78.4%
29W–8L · 57.5% of games
4.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 56.2% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams