← Search

Sarah Ganse

— year-end
108 matches · 43W–65L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Sarah Ganse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Lanc CC - Beans · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregory Ganse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-08 · LCC - Gingrich/Ganse · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Whitney Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · Lancaster CC - Gingrich/Zechman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Lancaster CC - Gingrich/Zechman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Veronis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-30 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Gingrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Veronis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Lancaster CC - Gingrich/Zechman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Been
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · Lancaster CC - Gingrich/Zechman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Eynon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-06 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-02 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Teams34 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.5% of games
3.0
45.2%
19W–23L · 44.8% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 47.9% of games
6.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 41.7% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#1 Singles
16%
17 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe