← Search

Erin D'Amelio

Honolulu, HI
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 18W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erin D'Amelio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-05-09 · Deuces Wild · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cherie Dang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Deuces Wild · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · Deuces Wild · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thuy-Linh Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · Down Right Fierce · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan York mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-11 · Down Right Fierce · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raymond Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-01 · Lob City · #1 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Piamonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-25 · Down Right Fierce · #1 Female Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsey Watanabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-18 · Lob City · #1 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Piamonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-10-04 · Lob City · #1 Mixed Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Piamonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-20 · Down Right Fierce · #1 Female Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-13 · Down Right Fierce · #1 Mixed Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Lehrman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-02-09 · Lob City · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Piamonte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 44.4% of games
7.0
20%
3W–12L · 36.7% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.4% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
6W–16L · 40.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 21% of the time
#1 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
17%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer