← Search

Ramesh Kakula

— year-end
68 matches · 55W–13L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ramesh Kakula to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-05-03 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cesar Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-25 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandar Thakur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
Brian Kraft / John Roberts
2026-03-21 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bhu Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandar Thakur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-25 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-21 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Huff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Trung Tran / Mike Dunlap
2026-02-08 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Rosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-02-07 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bhu Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-01-18 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Huff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · McKinney/Patel M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Rosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-11-02 · McKinney/Patel-van Ham M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Huff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-19 · McKinney/Patel-van Ham M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Saurin Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 57.8% of games
4.0
85%
17W–3L · 62.1% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 80% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 73% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert