← Search

Dave Cunningham

Lexington, KY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 68W–67L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Dave Cunningham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-09-11 · KY/LEX/Ferretti/Pernice · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neal Manor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-13 · KY/LEX/Ferretti/Pernice · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carson Shumate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · KY/LEX/Ernst 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Hancock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · KY/LEX/Ernst 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Cunningham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · KY/LEX/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Cunningham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · KY/LEX/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Hancock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · KY/LEX/Ernst 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Cunningham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · KY/LEX/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Cobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-30 · KY/LEX/BANTZ-ROSS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Billy Rudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-30 · KY/LEX/BANTZ-ROSS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Billy Rudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · KY/LEX/Cunningham/Rudd · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scot Simonsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · KY/LEX/BANTZ-ROSS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Billy Rudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60.6%
40W–26L · 53.6% of games
3.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 45.5% of games
6.5
50%
6W–6L · 49.1% of games
3.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.8% of games
3.5mixed
10%
1W–9L · 33.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 31.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams