← Search

Brandy Fertig

Kirkland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 58W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brandy Fertig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-01-09 · BC-Ball Hunters-Taylor · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-04 · BC-Ball Hunters-Taylor · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Kaptik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-09-19 · #1 Doubles · with Brett Shell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Brett Shell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
Brian Namba / Sharon Lee
2025-07-13 · NWW-BC-Vegarra · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brett Shell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-06-29 · NWW-BC-Vegarra · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brett Shell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-29 · BC-Cho · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Huard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-05-23 · BC-Cho · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audrey Scallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-16 · BC-Cho · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-04-11 · BC-Cho · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-03-28 · BC-Cho · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audrey Scallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-09 · BC-Taylor · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Huard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
13W–0L · 81.4% of games
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 57.6% of games
4.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#1 Singles
13%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer