← Search

Carrie Erickson

Highlands ranch, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 114W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carrie Erickson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
W
2026-09-03 · HRCA-N WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Coker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · HRCA-N WHITE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Coker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · HRCA-N WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Lazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · HRCA-N BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · HRCA-N WHITE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · HRCA-N RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · HRCA-N BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-25 · HRCA-N RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · HRCA-N BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-11 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-09 · HRCA-N RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Keller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
83.3%
50W–10L · 63.7% of games
3.5
75.3%
64W–21L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
12 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert