← Search

Rose Conroy

— year-end
65 matches · 28W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rose Conroy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-06-22 · STL/McGauley-Heck-LoPiccolo/40&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Loomes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · STL/McGauley-Heck-LoPiccolo/40&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Loomes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-05-04 · McLoHeck (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lara Vitiello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-13 · McLoHeck (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lara Vitiello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-06 · McLoHeck (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-02-16 · McLoHeck (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly LoPiccolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-09 · McLoHeck (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb McGauley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-24 · McLoHeck (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Padmaja Suresh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-29 · McLoHeck (FD) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Balice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-28 · Rhoads (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-09-21 · Rhoads (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-08 · McLoHeck (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb McGauley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams20 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.6% of games
3.0
43.6%
24W–31L · 48.2% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert