← Search

Emma M Cestero

San Juan, PR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 114W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emma M Cestero to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hector Rivera Martinez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-12 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nelson Viera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-04 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luis Rodriguez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nelson Viera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nelson Viera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · Club San Francisco - Duos Dinamicos · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claudio Reck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · Club San Francisco - Duos Dinamicos · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alfredo Lugo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · with Victoria Zoldi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
3.0
61.1%
44W–28L · 52.6% of games
6.0
44.1%
15W–19L · 49.2% of games
7.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 47.6% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 63.8% of games
6.0mixed
36.2%
21W–37L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
31%
9W–20L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
63 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
19 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams