← Search

Mayleinne Santiago

— year-end
153 matches · 95W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mayleinne Santiago to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
W
2026-06-30 · Baldrich- Baez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oczane Rivera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · Baldrich- Baez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oczane Rivera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Baldrich- Baez · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oczane Rivera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · Baldrich- Baez · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oczane Rivera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · Baldrich- Baez · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oczane Rivera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-22 · Baldrich- Baez · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristina Castillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Baldrich- Baez · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oczane Rivera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Baldrich- Baez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veronica Amarilis Roman OFarrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · CTH - Janiana Roddriguez - AJ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Sabater mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-15 · Baldrich - Hector Baez · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose Rios mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-01 · Baldrich - Hector Baez · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose Rios mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-28 · Baldrich - Hector Baez · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose Rios mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
12W–3L · 62% of games
3.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.2% of games
3.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 63.6% of games
4.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 58.4% of games
7.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
37 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
7 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams