← Search

Courtney Reichs Mixon

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 46W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Courtney Reichs Mixon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
Janine Rust / Sarah Harris
2026-09-11 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · MSevigny (Carmel) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · #4 Doubles · with Sandy Dellinger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · with Jill Halverstam championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-15 · LDiman/TMagee (Carmel) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-4
L
2026-04-13 · JHalverstam (Carmel) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellie Lecka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · LDiman/TMagee (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-01 · LDiman/TMagee (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-25 · LDiman/TMagee (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Sevigny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-23 · JHalverstam (Carmel) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-06 · MZvara (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristy Boyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-06 · CMixon (Carmel) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Danesis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.8% of games
3.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 52.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
6.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.9% of games
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.5% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert