← Search

Cecilia Tammling

Chatham, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 36W–12L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cecilia Tammling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Melissa Hammer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-05 · NJ: West Orange · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Saori Shiokawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-29 · NJ: West Orange · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-15 · NJ: West Orange · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-5
W
2026-05-13 · NJD/Favia · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-08 · Here Comes Trouble · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · NJD/Favia · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · Here Comes Trouble · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · NJD/Favia · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · Here Comes Trouble · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
Christine Syvertson / Ann Graff
2025-08-17 · #1 Doubles · with Melissa Hammer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Rebecca Bellingham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.9% of games
4.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 70.7% of games
4.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert