← Search

Elisabeth Nixon

Raleigh, NC
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
72 matches · 19W–53L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elisabeth Nixon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Ca.Wilborne18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-27 · El.Nixon40S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-4
L
2026-06-03 · Ca.Wilborne18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · El.Nixon40S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · Ka.Southern40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Vandecarr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-28 · Ka.Southern40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Shelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-23 · Hop.Pflaum55A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Amanda Zukowski / Elizabeth Thompson
2026-04-14 · Ka.Southern40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Pilos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-09 · Hop.Pflaum55A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Pflaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-26 · Hop.Pflaum55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Marion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-05 · Hop.Pflaum55A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Marion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-08-26 · El.Nixon40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Pilos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 48.7% of games
3.0
16.7%
5W–25L · 34.3% of games
5.0
0%
0W–7L · 29.2% of games
5.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 32% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches
#3 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova