← Search

Brian Osborne

Weehawken, NJ
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 26W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brian Osborne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-07-06 · Bergen:WTF 18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · WTF 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arthur Ferrante
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-15 · Bergen:WTF 18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cirasola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Nat Charoensook / John Kim
2026-06-12 · Bergen:WTF 18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Keaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-12-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aristotle Abiog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-11-02 · #2 Doubles · with Giorgio Valentini championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-07-17 · Bergen: Bergen Bad Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leighton Haniff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-1
L
2024-07-08 · Bergen: WTF · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Gould
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-01 · Bergen: WTF · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Daubert-Terrigno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-06-26 · Bergen: Bergen Bad Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Ferrante
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-17 · Bergen: WTF · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandru Platonov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.5% of games
3.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 51.3% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0%
0W–9L · 36.4% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 28.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams