← Search

David Le

Houston, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 22W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add David Le to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-06-04 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Tagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-30 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Tagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-12 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-02-05 · Lost Forest - Big City Rip · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with JMichael Ereti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-10 · Lost Forest - D's · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruben Pena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-08 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jorge Namerow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-25 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brandon Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-11 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chris Cais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chris Cais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
45.5%
15W–18L · 47.8% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe