← Search

Jeff Rodanski

Longmont, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 158W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Rodanski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
L
2026-08-23 · LTA-Q RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dionne Jimenez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · LTA-Q RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dionne Jimenez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Stewart Wedge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Stewart Wedge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Prabhakar Chandana championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Richard Plett / Dan Johnson
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Matheson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · LTA-Q RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dionne Jimenez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · LTA-Q RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dionne Jimenez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Scott Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Christie Deluca championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Christie Deluca championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-14 · LTA-Q BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Matheson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
65.9%
27W–14L · 55.6% of games
3.5
84.6%
33W–6L · 62.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
10W–0L · 69.8% of games
6.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 68% of games
7.0mixed
84.6%
33W–6L · 64.2% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
56 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams