← Search

Sara Robbins

— year-end
218 matches · 147W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sara Robbins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
W
2026-08-22 · STC-Schroeder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Rohrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · STC-Schroeder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-19 · STC-Brann · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charlene Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · STC-Brann · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Celeste Hartings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · STC-Brann · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Leadman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
Mary Miller / Vicki Davis
2026-06-27 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorraine Paxson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Jessie Dailey / Susan Smith
2026-06-13 · STC-Brann · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorraine Paxson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · STC-Schroeder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Westfall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · STC-Schroeder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Rohrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · STC-Brann · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.7% of games
3.5
74.4%
64W–22L · 61.2% of games
4.0
64.1%
25W–14L · 55.7% of games
6.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 57.1% of games
7.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 56% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
51 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams