← Search

Victoria Luksch

— year-end
118 matches · 71W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Victoria Luksch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-06-27 · ESB:Not My Fault:Strausser/Blackmore · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-06 · ESB:Not My Fault:Strausser/Blackmore · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-11 · MIT:Match.Net:Marshall · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Wygmans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-22 · MIT:Overserved:Dunn/Young · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-21 · MIT:Match.Net:Marshall · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Keil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-22 · MIT:Overserved:Dunn/Young · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-21 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Blackmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-31 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Peluso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · MIT:Tie Dye Breakers:Dunn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Peluso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
87.5%
21W–3L · 69.1% of games
4.0
51.1%
24W–23L · 53.1% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.7% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.9% of games
8.0
50%
6W–6L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 63.6% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
58 matches
#1 Singles
23%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova