← Search

Tara Hammar

Lakewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 172W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tara Hammar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history263 matches
W
2026-08-27 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Curtis Hammar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lydia Pistol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · NJ YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derria Banta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Curtis Hammar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-07 · NJ YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Keighley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-05 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · NJ YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 58% of games
3.0
68.5%
76W–35L · 57.9% of games
3.5
85.2%
23W–4L · 60.3% of games
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
61.8%
21W–13L · 57.2% of games
6.5mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
119 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
41 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
20 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King