← Search

Jennifer Potts

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 31W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Potts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-05-26 · Watling/SH 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Watling/SH 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emilie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · Watling/SH 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emilie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · Watling/SH 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emilie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-09 · Watling/SH 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-02 · Watling/SH 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-06 · Watling/SH/3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-27 · Watling/SH/DAY3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emilie Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-09-29 · Watling/SH/DAY3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Wilkerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-24 · Watling/SH/3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelli Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-22 · Watling/SH/DAY3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-09-16 · Watling/SH/3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitney Bingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.2% of games
3.0
28.9%
13W–32L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams