← Search

Helen Kasper

Edmond, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 40W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Helen Kasper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-06-17 · Lines Are In · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kym Koch Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-03 · Lines Are In · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kym Koch Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · Lines Are In · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula Chavez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-04 · Sugar & Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-10-28 · Sugar & Slice · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Burkhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-21 · Sugar & Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maryann Bakker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-14 · Sugar & Slice · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maryann Bakker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-07 · Sugar & Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-09-30 · Sugar & Slice · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Burkhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-02 · Sugar & Slice · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Galatian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-06-27 · Sugar and Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Haymaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-24 · Sugar and Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maryann Bakker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
56%
14W–11L · 53.3% of games
3.0
46.5%
20W–23L · 47.7% of games
6.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams