← Search

David Gwizdowski

Bristol, RI
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
61 matches · 25W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Gwizdowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-08-26 · CC: Bell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Waxman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-24 · CC: Bell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Waxman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-29 · CC: Bell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Griffeth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · CC: Marrin/McGwin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Valk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · CC: Marrin/McGwin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · CC: Marrin/McGwin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · CC: Marrin/McGwin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · CC: Marrin/McGwin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · CC: Marrin/McGwin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark McGwin III
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-12 · CC: Wed Night Guys/McGwin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Axelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2025-07-31 · CC: Bell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Gorham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 5-2
L
2025-07-28 · CC: Wed Night Guys/McGwin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Axelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 2-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
64%
16W–9L · 55.4% of games
7.0
26.5%
9W–25L · 41.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova