← Search

Kathy Hodges

— year-end
63 matches · 23W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kathy Hodges to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-06-29 · Stephanie Womack · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Everett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Tami Turner / Katherine Wilson
2026-06-15 · Stephanie Womack · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Kleffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Kathy Hodges · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-08 · Stephanie Womack · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · Kathy Hodges · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-01 · Stephanie Womack · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Kleffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-04 · April Edwards 3.0-4.0 Women · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beverly Horvit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-04 · April Edwards 3.0-4.0 Women · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jill Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-29 · Kathy Hodges · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mihail Popescu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-4
W
2025-07-21 · Kathy Hodges · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Hoffmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-07-15 · Kathy Hodges · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mihail Popescu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-14 · Kathy Hodges · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 23.8% of games
3.5
46.4%
13W–15L · 50.6% of games
4.0
21.1%
4W–15L · 36.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams