← Search

Hillel Wirsztel

Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 19W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Hillel Wirsztel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-07-23 · Delaware Dominetters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Viraf Ranji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-10 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-3
L
2026-06-29 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Perry Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-31 · Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with GALICANO INGUITO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · Penn Ball Wizards · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with GALICANO INGUITO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-10 · Team Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Xiaoming Ma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-02 · Dupont CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Silverman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-01-21 · Dupont CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
43.9%
18W–23L · 47.1% of games
6.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.3% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 34.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 62% of the time
#3 Doubles
62%
32 matches
#1 Singles
15%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer