← Search

Lisa Faber

— year-end
41 matches · 21W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lisa Faber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-09-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Colleen Sonneborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · BELVEDERE TC 40MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · BELVEDERE TC 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Portnoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · REDWOOD HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hocking
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · BELVEDERE TC 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Christodoulo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · REDWOOD HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hocking
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-29 · BELVEDERE TC 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Flaherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · BELVEDERE TC 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marjorie Swain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · BELVEDERE TC 18AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Sheedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · BELVEDERE TC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · REDWOOD HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hocking
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · BELVEDERE TC 18AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hocking
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 49.5% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe