← Search

Ann Lent

Lubbock, TX
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 9W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ann Lent to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
Jin Lee / Becky Kerby
2026-06-13 · Carter/Jenkins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Chad Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Carter/Jenkins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Chad Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Carter/Jenkins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Chad Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · Carter/Jenkins · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Chad Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · Carter/Jenkins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Chad Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
Becky Kerby / Jin Lee
2026-05-27 · Carter/Jenkins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Chad Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Meja · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reagan Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · Meja · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Purdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-15 · Boggs/Zaragoza · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Purdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Holly Carter / Ashley Copeland
2026-04-13 · Meja · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Reagan Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-25 · Boggs/Zaragoza · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Purdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Julie Williams / Kate Williams
2026-03-23 · Meja · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Purdue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 37.2% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
4 matches
#1 Singles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams