← Search

Eric Putman

Elkridge, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
338 matches · 137W–201L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Eric Putman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history338 matches
L
2026-09-08 · munshell - IHT 7.5 ComboMix · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy LaMoure mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · Match Strykers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Goldy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · Match Strykers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Yannone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · munshell - IHT 7.5 ComboMix · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy LaMoure mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-30 · Match Strykers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Goldy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Putman - CourtDogs 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ethan Stryker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-24 · Putman - CourtDogs 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ethan Stryker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · Albert - Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dubois Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · Albert - Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jeffrey Katz / James Smith
2026-07-14 · Albert - Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-11 · Match Strykers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Poore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-19 · Albert - Penn Ball Wizards · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Stryker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.1% of games
3.5
44.6%
45W–56L · 48.5% of games
4.0
23.5%
12W–39L · 39.9% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 70.5% of games
7.0
39.5%
15W–23L · 46% of games
7.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 49% of games
6.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.2% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
47.5%
29W–32L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
5%
1W–19L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
122 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
102 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer