← Search

Tina Verbeke

Grosse Pointe Woods, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 105W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tina Verbeke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-08-31 · EAST-Weathers 7.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ian Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · EAST-Perkins 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Austin Nancarrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · EAST-Weathers 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Albert de Veer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · EAST-Perkins 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alex Pepin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · EAST-Perkins 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zak Kwiecinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · EAST-Perkins 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zak Kwiecinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Leanne Sherman / Kelly Moran
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Jenifer Horn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · EAST-Thomas 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · EAST-Thomas 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · PEACH-Parrott 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Carnaghi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · EAST-Frazier 55s 6.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shannon Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · PEACH-Parrott 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Eckert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
80.8%
21W–5L · 71.5% of games
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 62.8% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 71.5% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 73.5% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 64.6% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 68.1% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 66% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.9% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#1 Singles
16%
23 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer