← Search

Jean-Laurent Pageault

Las Vegas, NV
5.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 36W–12L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Jean-Laurent Pageault to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2023-10-07 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Mims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
David Irons
2023-08-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-08-12 · #2 Doubles · with Max Novak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Shane Garner
2023-08-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-05-14 · TPC · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mandalay LaBarre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2023-05-13 · NV/PRANDECKI/ADULT18&OVER/M5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-11 · NV/PRANDECKI/ADULT18&OVER/M5.0 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Matthew Mims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-04-30 · TPC · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mandalay LaBarre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Brian Allen / Raymond Weich
2023-04-28 · NV/PRANDECKI/ADULT18&OVER/M5.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Matthew Mims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-04-16 · TPC · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mandalay LaBarre mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2023-03-31 · NV/PRANDECKI/ADULT18&OVER/M5.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ryan Gormley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-03-24 · NV/PRANDECKI/ADULT18&OVER/M5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
75%
12W–4L · 65.6% of games
5.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 59.5% of games
10.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#1 Singles
29%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova