← Search

Edward Budd

Centennial, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 94W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Edward Budd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
W
2026-08-31 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Avery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Griff Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Griff Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Chandra Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Hoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carly Schwab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-05 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Veronica Figoli Fleischer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-28 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Veronica Figoli Fleischer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Hoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Veronica Figoli Fleischer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
56.3%
71W–55L · 52.2% of games
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.1% of games
5.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.5% of games
6.0mixed
35.7%
10W–18L · 44.6% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
45 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Male Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal