← Search

Eileen Linz

Shaker Heights, OH
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 27W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eileen Linz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Visconsi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-06 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · A18 3.0W KI Ziegler · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Visconsi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Colleen Bursic
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-27 · A18 3.0W KI Ziegler · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-26 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Visconsi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · A18 3.5W TCC Lane · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 57% of games
3.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 45.7% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
22 matches
#2 Singles
38%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert