← Search

David Deacon

Cumberland, RI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 22W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Deacon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-07-28 · FC: Yang/Racine · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Dakin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-29 · FC: Yang/Racine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seth Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-02 · FC: Yang/Racine · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Federico Read
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-11 · FC: Yang/Racine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Marren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-05-29 · FC: Yang/Racine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seth Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-21 · FC: Yang/Racine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seth Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-17 · FC: Yang/Racine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seth Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-06-05 · FC: Yang/Racine · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Dakin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 2-4
W
2023-07-11 · FC: Racine/Yang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Dakin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2023-06-29 · FC: Racine/Yang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Racine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 4-1
W
2023-06-22 · FC: Racine/Yang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Racine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-06-01 · FC: Racine/Yang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexander Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 59.2% of games
3.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King