← Search

Beomseok Baig

Auburn Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 43W–36L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Beomseok Baig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-08-19 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nadia Alchy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda Hodges mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · SCWB-Gay 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Russell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · SCWB- Tagawa 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Olga Bikhleyzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-31 · DEER-Crowe 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Helen Sardelli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · SCWB-Gay 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nadia Alchy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · DEER-Gurn 40s 3.5M F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Salk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Amitav Oehlberg / Anita Advaney
2026-07-17 · SCWB-Gay 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brittany Smithkort mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · DEER-Crafard 40s 3.0M F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mckay Shih
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
Gonzalo San Jose
2026-07-08 · DEER-Gurn 18s 3.5M F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · DEER-Crafard 40s 3.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martin Mcgeogh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.2% of games
3.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 40.3% of games
6.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.2% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.9% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#2 Singles
15%
12 matches
#1 Singles
13%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal