← Search

Mary Claire Brown

— year-end
41 matches · 15W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Mary Claire Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-09-09 · CTharp (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Julian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-27 · CTharp (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Kendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-16 · CTharp (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Cardell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-12 · CTharp (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Stormer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · MCBrown (Veterans Park) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · MCBrown (Veterans Park) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · ADutton/KJernigan (Hornets Nest) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · MCBrown (Veterans Park) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · ADutton/KJernigan (Hornets Nest) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · ADutton/KJernigan (Hornets Nest) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Klopfer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · MCBrown (Veterans Park) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-04 · RAddison/KMoore (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Belle Landzert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 50.4% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 35.9% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 39.3% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#2 Singles
20%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#3 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova