← Search

Mark Sadosky

— year-end
252 matches · 165W–87L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mark Sadosky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
W
2026-09-10 · 3.5 PTC2 HitandRun M18F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zane Culver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-09 · 3.5 SRP Scorpions M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · PHX/Grabel/55&O/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · 3.5 SRP Scorpions M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-16 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael DiPaolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · PHX/Grabel/55&O/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-05 · 3.5 SRP Scorpions M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-28 · PHX/Grabel/55&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Brauneis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-23 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-16 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael DiPaolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-01-05 · 3.5 PTC Fellowship M40S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael DiPaolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
66.9%
95W–47L · 56.9% of games
4.0
10%
1W–9L · 43.5% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 75.7% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 47.9% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 61% of games
7.0mixed
64.6%
31W–17L · 56.4% of games
7.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 57.8% of games
8.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 62.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
60 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams