Deanne Dixon
North Royalton, OH
76 matches · 27W–49L · seasons 2019–2025
Captains: add Deanne Dixon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history76 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2025
A18 3.0W MM1 Bode
A18 3.0W CC2 Stoica
A18 3.0W MM Bode
A55 6.0W NR Kubovchik
C 5.5W MM Debenham
X18 7.0 MM1 Dixon
X55 6.0 MM Bode
A18 3.0W 5 CC Garson
F 3.0S/6.0D CC1 Dixon
F 3.5S/7.0D CC Dixon
X18 6.0 CC Dixon
X18 6.0 CC Dixon
X18 7.0 CC Dixon
X18 7.0 CC Dixon
A18 3.0W CC2 Galeti
C 6.5W CC Becker
F 3.0S/6.0D CC Dixon
X18 6.0 CC Dixon
X18 6.0 CC Dixon
A18 3.0W CC Becker
A40 3.0W CC Becker
C 5.5W CC Wotawa
C 6.5W CC2 Moriarty
F 3.0S/6.0D CC Dixon
Tri B CC VanDine
X18 6.0 CC Dixon
X18 6.0 CC Dixon
X18 7.0 CC Hurley
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 78.9% of games
3.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 42.1% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 17.2% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.7% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
6.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 36.9% of games
6.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.