← Search

Marybeth Liang

— year-end
198 matches · 144W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marybeth Liang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history198 matches
L
2026-07-28 · LFNT:Tri me a river:Schmid/Chiang · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Gabriela Yetten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · WTC:Boom boom bonanza:Jeppson · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-6
W
2026-06-03 · WTC:Boom boom bonanza:Jeppson · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lisa Tholen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · WTC:Boom boom bonanza:Jeppson · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lisa Tholen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · LFNT:Tri me a river:Schmid/Chiang · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Connie Chiang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · SFT:Banana:Crabtree/Doria · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matti Teittinen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · SFT:Banana:Crabtree/Doria · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Lomenzo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-01-11 · SFT:Banana:Crabtree/Doria · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matti Teittinen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-21 · LFNT:LFW Natick:Trieu/Wallach · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kuangshin Tai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · LFNT:LFW Natick:Trieu/Wallach · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jimmie Ames mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
Hayan Marouf / Jessica Lee
2025-11-09 · #3 Doubles · with Jimmie Ames championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Luis Moreno / Kristin Ortiz
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · with Jimmie Ames championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 64.7% of games
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
4.5
75.8%
50W–16L · 62.1% of games
5.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.9% of games
7.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 65.2% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 61.2% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
45 matches
#1 Singles
19%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
32 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams