← Search

Amy Mikes

— year-end
10 matches · 5W–5L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Amy Mikes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
L
2022-03-25 · C 6.5W PW1 Burke · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Packer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-03-06 · C 6.5W PW1 Burke · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dawn Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2021-06-22 · A18 3.0W PW2 Hensley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neda Sopko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2021-06-08 · A18 3.0W PW2 Hensley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neda Sopko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2019-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Neda Sopko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2019-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Neda Sopko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Cheryl Trzcinski / Lara Herzak
2019-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rebecca Ott-Wadhawan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2019-06-05 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Kim Walker
2019-05-22 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2019-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Neda Sopko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams3 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.6% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#1 Singles
20%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova