← Search

Greer Mac Adams

BLYTHEWOOD, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 46W–34L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Greer Mac Adams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-08-12 · CTL18/WILKES/SEP · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Eifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Mary Wright / Lauren Lamey
2026-08-04 · CTL18/Wilkes/SEP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bridget Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-03 · CTL18/Wilkes/SEP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Spence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Sara Smith / Deyaska Sweatman
2026-07-22 · CTL18/WILKES/SEP · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alexandra Hayden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-30 · CTL18/Duhan/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Eaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-09 · CTL18/Duhan/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Duhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-23 · CTL18/Duhan/CTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ansley Seabrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-12 · CTL18/Duhan/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisabeth Walter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-09 · CTL18/Duhan/CTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisabeth Walter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-06-21 · CTL18/Pittman/CTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janie Mucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-31 · CTL18/Pittman/CTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vandrea Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Holliday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 71.9% of games
3.0
55.2%
32W–26L · 51.9% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.6% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 23% of the time
#1 Singles
23%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#2 Singles
19%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#3 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal