← Search

Jill Grams

Flagstaff, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 32W–33L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jill Grams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-08-15 · NAZ/Cohen/40&over/3.5mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rich Stephens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · Nicol · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Nicol · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirsten Aamodt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-12 · Nicol · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Bearchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · Nicol · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · NAZ/Vallen/40&over/3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bearchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · NAZ/Vallen/40&over/3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · Grams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johanna Steigerwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · Grams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Sartain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · Grams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Aamodt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · Grams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johanna Steigerwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Dana Jacko / Sue Koril
2026-01-25 · Grams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Sartain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
53.7%
22W–19L · 50.6% of games
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 55.4% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.7% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#1 Singles
15%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert