← Search

Christina Bartholomew

Chesapeake, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 87W–48L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Christina Bartholomew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuli Reams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Adriana Weatherly / Jennifer Harris
2026-09-03 · Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sutherlyn Brinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sutherlyn Brinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Jessica Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jessica Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
Nicole Watson / Nancy Scully
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jessica Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · Aston · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Latane Avery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Aston · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Flurry Yanez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · Aston · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Latane Avery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · Aston · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Courage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Jessica Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Jessica Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
65.9%
27W–14L · 58.5% of games
4.0
73.2%
30W–11L · 57.8% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 69.5% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 41.1% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams