← Search

Brett Henneberg

Bloomington, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 61W–44L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brett Henneberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-08-23 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Brinkman-Peoria · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Rozboril mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Lijian Zhang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Geoffrey Lin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sampa Ostrem mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · MSIL A18&O 3.5M Comte-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shishir Pandey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · MSIL A18&O 3.5M Comte-Bloomington · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Agne Cade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Hammie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Connor Brown
2026-06-27 · MSIL A18&O 3.5M Comte-Bloomington · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · MSIL A18&O 3.5M Comte-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayden King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
3.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 52.2% of games
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.5% of games
6.5mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.1% of games
7.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 44.8% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
28 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert