← Search

Cintia Shiro

Harrison, NY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
460 matches · 264W–196L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cintia Shiro to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history460 matches
L
2026-07-30 · Hirsh · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Texer Nam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-23 · Qin/Kelly · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Olivia Dalglish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Armonk Domes 18+ 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Rye Racquet 40+ 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Qin/Kelly · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yoeur-Man Teagan MacH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · Armonk Domes 18+ 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Rye Racquet 40+ 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jani Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · Rye Racquet 40+ 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Annie O'Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · Qin/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Olivia Dalglish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-5
W
2026-06-09 · SOL:Party at the Net:Casati-Lewis/Ulrich · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cristina Casati-Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Armonk Domes 18+ 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heike Martens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-03 · Rye Racquet 40+ 4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Ricciardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams106 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
56.6%
56W–43L · 54.1% of games
4.0
63.9%
94W–53L · 53.8% of games
4.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
55.2%
16W–13L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
60.8%
48W–31L · 52% of games
9.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
130 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
128 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
108 matches
#1 Singles
16%
75 matches
#2 Singles
4%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe