← Search

Sara Robinson

— year-end
124 matches · 73W–51L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sara Robinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
W
2026-08-03 · KY/LOU/MOORE/MARQUETTE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elena Marquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · KY/Lou/Robinson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Meador mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · KY/LOU/MARQUETTE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Marquette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
Andrea Smith / Mary Beth Meagher
2026-06-11 · KY/LOU/MOORE/MARQUETTE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elena Marquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · KY/LOU/MENTING/BAGLEY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Menting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-23 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristina Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-22 · KY/LOU/MENTING/BAGLEY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Greenrose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-10 · KY/LOU/MENTING/BAGLEY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Menting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Fetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · KY/LOU/BRADFORD · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
72.2%
26W–10L · 60.6% of games
3.5
53.8%
28W–24L · 52.4% of games
4.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 46.4% of games
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.4% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer