← Search

Sarah Declerk

— year-end
57 matches · 24W–33L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sarah Declerk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Murdock/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Olmos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · Sarah Declerk · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · DeClerk/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Law
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · DeClerk/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keelen Verser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-29 · DeClerk/LR/PVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Skyrme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-27 · Smouni/Rockefellar/LR/PVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Sarah Declerk · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · Smouni/Rockefellar/LR/PVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Yant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · DeClerk/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Castillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
William Hancock / Josephine Felton
2026-07-07 · Smouni/Rockefellar/LR/PVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MacKenzie Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · DeClerk/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keelen Verser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Smouni/Rockefellar/LR/PVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 51.3% of games
3.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 48% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 28.6% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.5% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams