← Search

Jack Livingston

Haskell, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 27W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jack Livingston to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Full Metal Rackets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ordonez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · Full Metal Rackets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Serrano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · We Hit Different · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kirk Tsahalis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · We Hit Different · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Belmonte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Full Metal Rackets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Eng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-27 · Full Metal Rackets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan D Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Racq Pacq · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexandra Miller Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-12 · Racq Pacq · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexandra Miller Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · Sandbaggers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Serrano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · Sandbaggers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-13 · Full Metal Racquets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ordonez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-29 · Full Metal Racquets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Sheffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
34.2%
25W–48L · 43.1% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.2% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#1 Singles
22%
18 matches
#2 Singles
11%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer