← Search

Heidy Ivy

Summit, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 43W–21L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Heidy Ivy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2025-03-30 · Drop Shots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-2, 0-1
L
2025-02-23 · Drop Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cara Maser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-26 · Drop Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Beebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-12-05 · Randolph · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marit Halper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-17 · Murray Hill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Apel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-09-26 · Murray Hill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-19 · Murray Hill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jodi Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-03-28 · Murray Hill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-03-10 · Drop Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Humphreys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-03-07 · Murray Hill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicki Mullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2024-02-29 · Murray Hill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abby Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-02-15 · Murray Hill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicki Mullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.8% of games
3.5
69.4%
34W–15L · 56.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#1 Singles
17%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert